New EU Laws governing cookies; will Google Analytics still be usable after May 25th?
-
Hi, first time I've posted a question, New EU Laws governing cookies; will Google Analytics still be usable after May 25th? - apologies in advance if its already been covered, but I couldn't find any answers when I searched - google search showed someone else ask the question already, but no straight answers were given:-
From May 25th the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive will come in to force which prohibits the use of cookies without informed, prior consent from web users. I've been trying to research to see whether or not this will affect Google Analytics.The Directive seems to be designed to prevent behavioural tracking, rather than web stats, but after reading the directive (with no law experience) I'm fairly confused by what will be prohibited. If anyone has any thoughts on the matter, I'd be very grateful!
-
Today's YouMoz is also about this subject. http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/not-freaking-out-about-the-eu-cookie-legislation
-
I’ve been keeping an eye on this topic myself, specifically trying to spot new & useful information from authoritative sources. The main area that’s of concern for all our customers is the grey area of Analytical cookies.
These two might be of interest:
1. It’s not about cookies, it’s about privacy – That’s from the Government Digital Service who look at websites like direct.gov.uk. It looks at the subject with some common sense and raises an interesting point that focussing on cookies may push sites into tracking users in other ways; using super cookie methods that the user cannot detect or control/disable as they can with standard cookies, which would be more intrusive.
Interestingly the GDS has taken a stance that analytical cookies are ‘minimally intrusive’ and (most importantly) ‘essential’ – which is a different line to the ICO. There’s a link to a PDF with guidelines at the end for government departments and other public sector bodies:
“Use of web-analytics/metrics: The use of metrics are integral are to departments’ being able to provide the best possible user experience in order to encourage citizens to use more cost-effective channels for accessing government services. They also allow departments to assess and demonstrate whether the digital services they offer provide “value-for-money” as demonstrated by the recent National Audit Office (NAO) report.
Consequently, collecting these metrics are essential to the effective operation of government websites, at present the setting of cookies is the most effective way of doing this. The ICO guidance supports this view as it states ’...it is highly unlikely that priority for any formal action would be given to focusing on uses of cookies where there is a low level of intrusiveness and risk of harm to individuals. Provided clear information is given about their activities we are unlikely to prioritise first-party cookies used only for analytical purposes in any consideration of regulatory action’”
2. EU cookie legislation – a look at some of the implementations – That’s new as of Friday, written by one of the Information Commissioner’s Office Technology Reference Panel:
_”+ First of all the 27th May deadline for implementing the legislation is more a marker for ICO – not a hard date. This means that from this time the ICO will start looking at the subject more closely.
- In the meantime in the run up to the end of May the ICO will publish information for individuals to allow them to raise concern via the ICO website. Note the ICO has not had much activity on the complaints front in last 12 months.
- They will also be making it clear that on an individual level it is unlikely that ICO will pursue 1 cookie on 1 web page
- The ICO can’t audit every UK website but can look at trends or patterns – eg if many issues raised about specific types of cookie
- ICO will also be issuing a clarification of its line on analytics cookies – these are not exempt from the law”_
It’s certainly a topic where the regulation and solution is still evolving. Personally I wonder if this might end up in the same situation as the DDA subject from a few years ago; the end result being that the worst offenders get a letter asking them to clean up their act, but for the rest of us who follow good practices there’s nothing to worry about.
-
As with many things in government, most of this is a "fix" to a problem that doesn't exist. If you don't want to be tracked, you can easily opt out. But the EU seems to think it knows better and declares that ALL cookies must be opt in only. This rule screams that it was written by people who want to push an ideology (i.e. government is going to save your privacy at all costs) and have no idea how the Internet works.
The largest problem with this rule is that there's no way to ascertain why a cookie was placed (most commonly called a session). In virtually all cases, cookies are pointers to something else. What's stupid is that you can still easily track people without cookies, you just pass your session ID in the URL. It's clunky but it works and there's no law against it. And there's always log parsing.
My bet is that there will be some sort of legal action taken against Google (the biggest fish in the pond) and we'll see where that goes. My bet is it stays in limbo until that trial is complete. I can't see anyone wasting the resources going after every violator.
-
Hi Ben
I've been looking into this a fair bit myself and have arrived at the following conclusions.
As already mentioned this whole legislation is up in the air to say the least, there is little guidance on how this will be practically implemented. From what i gather, general cookies that enhance usability by remembering information such as preferences etc are ok, however cookies that hold information that is deemed to be personal are more of an issue. Therefore i guess the case you make regarding Google analytics could be an interesting one.
We look after a number of medium weight websites that use cookies, some of which could be deemed to fall foul of this legislation, however so is just about every ecom site on the Internet. I am taking the view that i will see how the big boys tackle this, the likes of Amazon, Ebay, etc and follow their lead. For me this is one occasion not to be ahead of the game, especially as it will interfere with the purchase process and pretty much goes against every UX rule out there.
One other interesting point is that almost every site i have seen cover this story (BBC, Mashable, TechCrunch etc) all use cookies on the pages they are reporting this story on.
I suspect there will be a lot more debate and tweaking of this law before it is actually enforced as it seems impractical to implement as it stands
-
Hi Ben
welcome to the Q&A.
As (other) Ben says, there's no real clarity on this. Best practice would seem to dictate giving site visitors the option to opt-out the first time they visit after May 25th.
In reality, nobody is going to do this and kill their webstats, unless and until site owners are taken to court, and IMO that's most likely to happen to high-profile pubic service sites.
I'd suggest that good practice and as insurance, review your Privacy Policy to ensure it's clear what's being tracked and what's not using cookies, and ensure there's a reasonably prominent navigation link to the Policy.
-
Last time I checked (last month) no body knew. There is a definite case for them being allowed as part of the functionality of a website but it looks like this is going to be decide the first time the ICO takes someone ot court over it.
Sorry I couldn't give you a straight answer but I don't think there is one yet.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Panda 4.2 Is Here
Most of you guys probably already know - but Google Panda 4.2 has began. I would love to keep an open discussion regarding anyone who was affected by the last Panda update along with changes for the good/bad during this new roll out in addition to what vertical you are in. PANDA TIME! Your web therapist, Chenzo
Search Behavior | | Chenzo1 -
Personalised Geo-targeted results - How does Google pass link juice?
Hello, Many websites now serve specific home page offers based on the location of the customer, my question is, how does link juice flow around a site when the links (this case from the homepage) are served up based on a visitors location? Internal links from your homepage are valuable for ranking that product well in the SERPs so how does Google deal with this? So, for example, a car hire website based in the UK. If you arrive on the care hire website sat in Manchester (Northern UK city), on the homepage the website serves offers of car hire deals in Manchester, Leeds, London and international destinations. If you arrived on this website from London (Southern UK City), you would not see the Manchester link at all but London, and other cities in the South. In this case, when Google crawls the car hire website, it will see internal links but a)which version and b) is there any way of sharing this link value around? Basically, we want to understand if Manchester in this case will get the benefit of an internal homepage link from Google even though we only show Manchester to people FROM Manchester, OR, do Google only give juice based on one version of the website, a generic UK version? Or to put it another way, is there any way of cashing in on both geo-targetting the customer based on their location AND getting link juice from those geo-specific home page links? Perhaps there is some code or way of telling Google that people from Manchester (a certain % of our visitors) will see a homepage internal link for Manchester that will pass some small % link value?
Search Behavior | | xoffie0 -
When Googling site:mydomain.com what does listing order tell us?
To find all the pages on my site that are indexed by Google I can search using site:mydomain.com and it gives pages of results. But what does the order of results relate to? Is it page rank or strength? My list of pages doesn't appear to be in order of strength. And it's definitely not by age or alphabetical...
Search Behavior | | GregB1230 -
Industry Benchmarks for Google Analytics
Hey Mozites! I was wondering if anyone has come across any good resources for industry benchmarks relating to google analytics? (Social stats would be great as well, but Google Analytics is my main concern) Specifically, I have a client that is a bank and I would love to be able to compare their stats (traffic, unique visitors, bounce rate, time on site, conversion rates...) to other regional banks. Any ideas? Thanks for reading and for your help!
Search Behavior | | iBecC0 -
Google Analytics Search Engine Optimisation Report
Hello, Quick question. How much data should be available within Google Analytics within the Search Engine Optimisation Reports? I was always of the impression it was 6 months, however the data available as of this date only extends back to January 1st 2013. Thanks,
Search Behavior | | HelloAlba0 -
Recovering from a Hack: How long until Google reindexes changes?
In a previous post I made, I was able to determine that one of my sites; http://pokeronamac.com/ was hacked and was feeding spam perscription drug content to search engines, then redirecting to another site when clicked on Google. I then contacted my web host, and, after they did a scan of our files, they determined that something within the wp-includes directory was compromised and malicious. They removed the file, though they weren't able to determine the source of the attack, or how they god in (should we be scared?). Anyway, its been several days now ~5 and if I do a site search the spam pages still show up, but the redirect is no longer working. At this point, I am at a standstill, because i'm loosing traffic on my site by about 90%, and google hasn't sent us any warnings of malaware or the like. I know I was recommended against this before, but should I attempt to submit a reconsideration request, or should I just wait it out? Thanks for your help, Zach
Search Behavior | | Zachary_Russell0 -
Googles 'freshness' update and how it may affect Estate Agents.
We have some clients who have raised concerns over how this new update will affect them. They are an Estate Agents who regularly update their property portfolio, blogs and news section etc. Can you advise how they may or may not be directly affected? Thank you.
Search Behavior | | SoundinTheory0 -
Is it still possible in certain industries
To take a site from no where to the top of google in some of the top industries such as Gambling and Finance. I am a never say never type entrepreneur and say yes the logic is there as with all SEO to break into it. How do you feel the internet will shape up in say 10 years time will we see less of the smaller guys take on the world with the larger keywords.
Search Behavior | | onlinemediadirect0