LocalBusiness vs. Physician
-
I have a physician who is a client and I'm wondering: is there any advantage to having their schema.org as "LocalBusiness" vs. Physician?
Clearly as Physician is a sublisting, it should be fine. But I'm just curious. Other than future-proofing is there any "real-time" advantage?
Thanks for any insight!
-
Thanks for asking such a good question. Glad to help!
-
Well thanks for your openness and your suggestion. I agree that it makes logical sense that if you are an MD, to go as an MD. Many thanks!
-
Hi Titan552,
The fact of the matter is that there is little research to support a rock-solid conclusion on this. Here is a list (partial, I think) of the business types supported by specific Schema:
http://schema.org/LocalBusiness
Here is my thinking on this - if specific schema exists for your category of business, you should use it. After all, the whole point of Schema markup is to make information as explicit as possible. If it's possible to 'label' a business as being a physician, then that is more descriptive than simply calling it 'organization', 'local business'. I just recently discussed this with some colleagues and this is the conclusion we reached. This conclusion, as I've said, is not based on studies of any kind. I don't know of any that have been done. It more of a common sense approach. Hope it makes good sense to you!
-
Thank you for your reply. And yes, if the website doesn't come up for the Dr.'s own name in search then we've got bigger fish to fry.
But all things being equal, as an adjunct to other traditional SEO techniques, does the "physician" schema.org classification make any difference over "LocalBusiness"?
It is really a semantic difference, or does the subcategory under "LocalBusiness" really make a signifigant difference?
Then again, I would imagine that it coudn't hurt, especially if the SE's decide in the future to actually use the subcategories (physicians, lawyers, etc).
Thanks.
-
Titan552,
We work with many healthcare and medical providers like dentists, chiro's, eye docs, etc and find that optimizing their names like John Smith DDS or Dr John Smith is more effective than their business name/local business name. The reason being, people are more prone to search for the doctor's name or some variation of it with the city they know they are in. I would like to note that this tactic is best for single doctor facility/business. Now, when we have several doctors in one location/business, then optimizing the business name/local business is effective and would place that in the scheme.org listing.
Hope this was helpful! - Patrick
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Homepage title tag: "Keywords for robots" vs "Phrases for users"
Hi all, We keep on listening and going through the articles that "Google is all about user" and people suggesting to just think about users but not search engine bots. I have gone through the title tags of all our competitors websites. Almost everybody directly targeted primary and secondary keywords and few more even. We have written a very good phrase as definite title tag for users beginning with keyword. But we are not getting ranked well comparing to the less optimised or backlinked websites. Two things here to mention is our title tag is almost 2 years old. Title tag begins with secondary keyword with primary keyword like "seo google" is secondary keyword and "seo" is primary keyword". Do I need to completely focus on only primary keyword to rank for it? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Wistia vs. YouTube
Hello, Mozzers! Sorry if I've missed a thread on this, but I didn't find anything after searching for a while... I've used Wistia for years - LOVE the service and the company! Had great luck getting Rich Snippets, ranked well... until the recent Google change. Now all of my Wistia thumbnails have disappeared (though my rankings have stayed strong, thank goodness!) M question is, does it make sense to now embed YouTube videos on our site, and to create a video sitemap with those pages, with the hope that Google will rank the page better than it otherwise would have, knowing that there is valuable (video) content on the page? This is new videos, I'm not thinking of replacing my Wistia videos at this time. I'll probably need to clarify as I see your responses, since this is a tricky set of interrelated decisions. Thanks for any thoughts that anyone may have! 🙂 ~ Scott
Algorithm Updates | | measurableROI1 -
Branded vs non-branded query
So there's an obvious difference between a branded and non-branded search term, but I'm interested in the SERPs that are shown as a result. Branded search only results in 7 listings on the first page - obviously because branded search is generally more navigational in nature and the lower results get minimal CT. Are their any technical differences beyond this? Also, how does google define a branded search term? Because a search for Vodafone or Dell show reduced results, but Coca Cola does not. Thanks guys 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | underscorelive0 -
Local Listings vs. Spreading Too Thin
Hello SEO Community, I'm trying to find the right balance between adapting to Googles move towards local listings and not spreading out my site too thin. We provide our services nationally and currently have local city listings (i.e. http://www.cleanedison.com/courses/city/IL-Chicago) but these do not show up in the SERPs for individual products + city (i.e. Building Analyst Chicago) So I could make individual pages for each product in each city, but that would exponentially increase the number of URLs on the site and probably inundate me with duplicate content. Is there a better way I could take advantage of local listings without creating all the duplicate content and other problems that would arise with individual URLs? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
Location Vs. Typing
Hi all, I wonder I am NOT located in Dallas and i type in Google : buy groceries online dallas Is it the same like someone in Dallas that will type: buy groceries online Lets say the two persons open a new incognito window and their history no effects the resoults Thank you ivgi
Algorithm Updates | | iivgi0 -
CPC vs Competition.....
what relation does CPC and Competition have? i intend to purchase some high CPC domains, so i want to know what relation exists between CPC and Competition? should i always consider high CPC domains as highly competitive domains or they does have dependance on each other?
Algorithm Updates | | parallelseo0 -
FLASH vs HTML links in SEO
In terms of a small flash slideshow and having text and links on various slides within, is such text and links as easily index-able (or even at all) compared to static html text on a webpage?
Algorithm Updates | | heritageseo0 -
Data on Google Vs Bing, et al and changes to sites.
I am curious to know if anyone has any data that correlates site/page changes like content or Title Tag, H1, etc. and subsequent movement in rankings on Google and Bing and Yahoo? The equation is for example: ABCSite.com/home-page/ makes a change to the H1 and H2 and one paragraph of content is changed. Over next 6 to 12 weeks changes in page rank for the 3 engines is tracked to see where it started and where it "stopped." Obviously, there are more factors than individual algorithms in play here. An example of that would be that a significant number of sites will be indexed in Google by a dev and not in the others. We see this regularly. So, at least from a timing standpoint, different sites are entering/leaving the fray at different rates. We are going to begin to track this but I would love to see any data already around or speak with anyone involved in such a study about what they found. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | RobertFisher0